Evaluation
2010 Hepatitis: Update on Evolving Viral Therapy
P.A.C.E. INSTRUCTIONS
Accreditation for this educational program has expired, but please take the time to complete the following evaluation form. Thank you for your interest and support of the educational programming provided on DNAMedEdCafe.com.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Were the following overall learning objectives met? At the conclusion of this educational activity, are you able to :
Not Met
Reinforcement
Moderate Improvement
Significant Improvement
Describe the role of viral replication in disease progression of HBV or HCV.
1
2
3
4
Identify patients with active viral replication who are candidates for antiviral therapy.
1
2
3
4
Explain the most recent data on HCV drugs in clinical development.
1
2
3
4
Recognize the emergence of antiviral resistance in treatment of chronic viral hepatitis.
1
2
3
4
If
"Not Met"
, please explain for each objective.
CONTENT
Strongly Disagree
Not Sure
Strongly Agree
The information presented at this activity was pertinent to my professional needs.
1
2
3
4
5
If you answered
"Disagree"
or
"Strongly Disagree"
, please explain.
The information was presented in a fair and balanced manner and examined the topic with scientific rigor.
1
2
3
4
5
If you answered
"Disagree"
or
"Strongly Disagree"
, please explain.
Was the content free from bias or commercialism?
No
Yes
Comments?
EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY
Please rate the faculty overall teaching ability and organization of the material.
Low/Poor
High/Excellent
Not Applicable
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky, MD, PhD
1
2
3
4
5
NA
Paul Martin, MD
1
2
3
4
5
NA
Please rate the faculty's overall knowledge and level of expertise regarding the subject
Low/Poor
High/Excellent
Not Applicable
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky, MD, PhD
1
2
3
4
5
NA
Paul Martin, MD
1
2
3
4
5
NA
Please rate the quality of the learning materials.
1
2
3
4
5
NA
Was the time provided for the discussion/question and answer period adequate?
1
2
3
4
5
NA
OUTCOMES
Is it likely you will change the way you practice based on what you learned in this activity?
No
Yes
Please explain the reason for your answer.
FACILITIES
Low/Poor
High/Excellent
Not Applicable
What was the quality of the meeting facilities or website?
1
2
3
4
5
NA
Why?
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Please suggest topics and/or speakers you would like for future activities.
What were the strengths of this activity?
How could this program have been improved?
Submit
